> According to the FHS [2], libusb should so be > installed in /lib. The other option is to compile > newhidups statically with libusb. First option is a good one ! > There are pros and cons for both solution, but > I (as upstream and DD) am more for the first. I think so > Note that I've previously contacted libusb maintainer > (salut Aurelien) to talk with him about that. What does he say about this ? > Feedback and comments are welcomed... I think that (if it's statically linked to libusb) : - newhidups updates would be longer - nut maintainer (you) would have useless work to do - fhs says : The /lib directory contains those shared library images needed to boot the system and run the commands in the root filesystem, ie. by binaries in /bin and /sbin. We need to run a command in the root filesystem. Furthermore - the package is unusable now nb
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?=