On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 11:25:07AM -0400, sean finney wrote: > well, there's the /srv directory, but it doesn't go into a lot of > specifics. It goes into enough specifics that we know it's not going to be useful for us. "This setup will differ from host to host. Therefore, no program should rely on a specific subdirectory structure of /srv existing or data necessarily being stored in /srv." Oh, and "Distributions must take care not to remove locally placed files in these directories without administrator permission." which basically means that we can't use dpkg to put anything in there, because dpkg will blot an existing file. Everything in there would have to be conffiles or protectively managed. Blergh. - Matt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature