Re: SPF - exim4 + debian.org
Jiri Klouda <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> What I don't understand, as you say, if its just important
> for the large installations, why it cannot be them to change
> the user/group name, instead many users that don't have the
> problem are forced to change it to something sensible.
Why are "many users" "forced to change it to something sensible"?
Because they think it's ugly?
That's, um, not very compelling, especially when compared to the much
more serious nature of the problem on the other side (user-name conflict).
Run away! Run away!