* Hamish Moffatt (hamish@debian.org) wrote: > On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 09:06:37AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > > It seems to me that a problem is being invented so that it can be > > 'fixed'. The problem doesn't exist and 'fixing' it just makes things > > ugly for no reason. > > I think that's a good argument not to change it again. The only argument > I've seen against "Debian-exim" is that it's "ugly". And causes problems for scripts people run, general expectations, and the fact that pretty much everyone but the exim maintainers would prefer 'exim', which would be in-line with every other package that uses a username in Debian, near as I can tell. Sorry, the argument doesn't go both ways- there *are* problems w/ a username of 'Debian-exim', the many bugs you see filed about it bear this out. Are there bugs filed the other way? Do you have some justification for beliveing their would be? Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature