On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 03:37, Miles Bader wrote: > Jiri Klouda <jk@zg.cz> writes: > > What I don't understand, as you say, if its just important > > for the large installations, why it cannot be them to change > > the user/group name, instead many users that don't have the > > problem are forced to change it to something sensible. > > Why are "many users" "forced to change it to something sensible"? > Because they think it's ugly? > > That's, um, not very compelling, especially when compared to the much > more serious nature of the problem on the other side (user-name conflict). Not to mention, the username is compiled into the binary. At least the last time I compiled Exim4 by hand. -- greg, greg@gregfolkert.net The technology that is Stronger, better, faster: Linux
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part