On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 03:00:21AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Well, the necessity was recognized, Mako has answered our questions as
> well as he could. That settles this particular issue for now, at
> least for me.
I agree. I'm satisfied with the communication with fellow DD's that
Mako is now partaking.
> If you disagree with Mako's judgement, you should ask the DPL to
> remove him from his duty.
I think that is a bit rash. I'm asking for communication, not a
justfication for actions. I did not bring up any talk of questioning
his judgement, just the lack of communication (however little that might
be possible given the NDA).
> > Trust is tied closely to communication and transparency of action.
> Is it? I don't think so.
So, we agree to disagree. In a highly disparate community that relies
upon mediums such as email, IRC, and web pages, how else do you propose
to build a case for trust?
Again, if you disagree with the following statement, then we shall agree
to disagree:
Communication as an essential component in the relationship between a
representative and his or her community at large, regardless of the
topic or focus of representation.
In other words,
<quote type=movie id="austin powers">Give me a bone, here...</quote>
--
Chad Walstrom <chewie@wookimus.net> http://www.wookimus.net/
assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature