On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 12:37:47PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote: > I see no reason the information should be dispersed only privately. I'm trying my best to balance the fact that the committee's discussions were *private* with the fact that I have participated in them in part as a representative of the Debian project. If I were the only participant in the discussions, things would be different. I'm pushing as hard as I can to get a public statement right away. I can't really do much else. > These negotiations are something that effect Debian as a whole, at > least from my point of view. Additionally, even with these > discussions taking place privately, I would think that in 6 months > there would have been something to report publicly. I would think so too. I've mentioned in other messages I'm extremely frustrated by the fact this has taken so long. I know that everybody involved is. > Have discussion happened? Yes. > Has any progress been made? Yes. > Does it look like we (Debian and the FSF) will be able to reach a > resolution to the noted problems with the GFDL? I think so. Regards, Mako -- Benjamin Mako Hill mako@debian.org http://mako.yukidoke.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature