[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Social Contract GR's effect on sarge

On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 12:37:47PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> I see no reason the information should be dispersed only privately.

I'm trying my best to balance the fact that the committee's
discussions were *private* with the fact that I have participated in
them in part as a representative of the Debian project. If I were the
only participant in the discussions, things would be different. I'm
pushing as hard as I can to get a public statement right away. I can't
really do much else.

> These negotiations are something that effect Debian as a whole, at
> least from my point of view.  Additionally, even with these
> discussions taking place privately, I would think that in 6 months
> there would have been something to report publicly.

I would think so too. I've mentioned in other messages I'm extremely
frustrated by the fact this has taken so long. I know that everybody
involved is.

> Have discussion happened?


> Has any progress been made?


> Does it look like we (Debian and the FSF) will be able to reach a
> resolution to the noted problems with the GFDL?

I think so.


Benjamin Mako Hill

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: