[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Social Contract GR's effect on sarge

On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 11:48:48PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 23:33:58 +0200, Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> said: 
> > Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> writes:
> >>> Even if the FSF were uncooperative (which I don't know), this fact
> >>> should be documented first.  Anything else is unprofessional and
> >>> will harm Debian in one way or the other.
> >>
> >> Working on it.
> >>
> >> Http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.xhtml.
> >>
> >> Comments welcome.
> > Mako Hill is the official delegate in this matter.  Maybe you could
> > get a status update from him?
> 	What makes you think I have not tried?

I haven't received an email from you about the GFDL since October.

I have been contacted directly by several developers and have tried to
answer each of them with status updates that say more than I can say
publicly without risking compromising the progress of the

In fact, you told me last fall you weren't interested in having this
information privately.


Benjamin Mako Hill

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: