Re: Debian needs more buildds. It has offers. They aren't being accepted.
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 08:14:01 +1100, Matthew Palmer <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
>> stretching my legs as I climb out from under the bridge>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 10:16:38PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 10:23:52AM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
>> > These people do not 'own' these jobs, do they?
>> Well, yes, they do, just as package maintainers 'own' their
>> packages. The people who do the work are the ones that get to make
>> the decisions.
> So I take it you'd support zero-day NMUs for jobs in Debian where
> there are release critical bugs in the work being done?
> (Let's see what I can catch myself with that one)
Very clever. What you have caught yourself, from my
perspective, is dislike. I fail to see how you can find that
productive; I certainly think that clever bvarbs introducing friction
don't tend to lead us anywhere.
Q: How does a hacker fix a function which doesn't work for all of the
elements in its domain? A: He changes the domain.
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C