Hi! On 2003-12-18 22:06 +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > What about /etc/init.d/kernfs or mountkernfs? > > OK, I would like to rename from /etc/init.d/devpts.sh to > /etc/init.d/mountfs, because (1) for example there is mountnfs which > mounts nfs (2) umountfs in initscripts un-mounts filesystems, so > "mountfs" makes a name pair. Any comments? Personally I find it a bit misleading since it is a very general name. A script named "mountfs" should do what mountall.sh currently does, this would make a sensible name pair to mountnfs IMHO. And "your" mountfs should somehow make clear that it is responsible only for the virtual file systems provided by the kernel; that's why I proposed mountkernfs. The name vfs (for "virtual" is already taken for a different concept in the kernel; what about "mountkfs", this is even shorter? Some consistency might be nice here, but OTOH, most users certainly won't notice or care. So do whatever you like best :-) Have a nice day! Martin, just compiling kernel 2.6.0 :-) -- Martin Pitt Debian GNU/Linux Developer martin@piware.de mpitt@debian.org http://www.piware.de http://www.debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature