Re: udev and /sys mounting [was: mounting tmpfs (and sysfs) defaultly in sarge?]
On 2003-12-15 10:04 +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> >From the view point of libc6 maintainer, it's no problem to merge /sys
> mount for /etc/init.d/devpts.sh. The name of devpts.sh should be
> renamed to something, though. And it can be also applied for /dev/shm
That sounds reasonable. I just don't wanted it in devpts.sh.
What about /etc/init.d/kernfs or mountkernfs?
> One remaining concern is: is it ok to create /sys and /dev/shm
> directory by glibc package?
I don't have neither the authority nor the experience to decide this
:-), but speaking as an user I would like that. Please just don't do
it when it already exists AND there are files in it (or sth different
than sysfs is mounted on it). Creating /dev/shm should be less
Have a nice day!
Martin Pitt Debian GNU/Linux Developer