Re: [OT] Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s)
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:15, Joel Baker <email@example.com> wrote:
> > The Anglican church is, in fact, the most likely among anyone except the
> > UUs to (eventually) decide that it's OK, for the same reasons that they
> > have (now) decided that it's OK to have gay clergy and formal recognition
> > of committment ceremonies (they won't call it marriage, or treat it as
> What are the UUs?
> One Anglican minister I knew told me of a couple who had been living together
> ("living in sin" as some people will say) for several years. They approached
> him about arranging a wedding ceremony, and he suggested that they need not
> bother as having established commitment through living together for so long
> was good enough.
What would Henry VIII do?
Jaldhar H. Vyas <firstname.lastname@example.org>
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/