On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 07:53:17AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 10:54:15PM -0500, Adam Lazur wrote: > > Sven Luther (sven.luther@wanadoo.fr) said: > > > Well, and what about subarches ? Or will it work only on the most common > > > of those ? Let's say, only newworld pmac for powerpc. > > > > Yellowdog Linux uses anaconda. They're solely focussed on powerpc, so if > > they provide more powerpc support than stock anaconda it could probably > > be incorporated. > > But do they care about the more obscure subarches, or only those that > make sense commercially ? I am thinking in particular about the > powerpc/apus subarches that debian supports, and which need amiga > partitioning and boot-loaders, which i seriously doubt they did > consider. So you're saying you're unwilling to do any work whatsoever to ensure Anaconda's portability? You want it all handed to your on a silver platter or you're just going to take your toys and go home? And this point isn't even specific to Anaconda. What are you doing to ensure the portability of d-i to obscure subarchitectures, especially non-PowerPC-based ones? -- G. Branden Robinson | The errors of great men are Debian GNU/Linux | venerable because they are more branden@debian.org | fruitful than the truths of little http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | men. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature