Bernhard R. Link wrote: > Both a system presenting a utter mess of uneeded things and technical > terms and a system only saying "Installation successful" or > "Installation failed" are two ends of user-unfriendly behaviour. > While the first can be at least cured with a good documentation, the > last is simply frustrating. Luckily d-i falls in neither of these camps, since there are some smart people working on it. For example, if it is running at a high priority level, skipping most user interaction, and something fails, it falls back to a lower priority level, giving the user a chance to manually correct whatever it was that broke. I think you'd better use your time by learning about and contributing to d-i, rather than writing uninformed, generic commentary. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
pgp5o6l8X7IJ6.pgp
Description: PGP signature