Re: [internal-projects] [Debian-multimedia] Start an official internal project!
>>>>> "gw" == Graham Wilson <bob@decoy.wox.org> writes:
gw> [1 <text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)>]
gw> On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 10:03:15PM +0100, andrea.glorioso@centrotemporeale.it wrote:
>> I still have to find a form which is workable, because I think
>> DeMuDi will have some very specific tweaks which won't find
>> their way into Debian (low-latency and preemptible kernel for
>> one,
gw> these patches will be standard in kernel 2.6, so this shouldnt
gw> be a problem.
Actually you are right, it would suffice - for the kernel packages as
well as for the other packages - to clearly mark DeMuDi specific
packages to conflict with other relevant packages.
>> metalog as standard syslog mechanism as another)
gw> you can just have your default installer (which would be based
gw> on d-i i assume) install that instead of sysklogd.
I'm evaluating whether to use d-i as a base, pgi, or anything else.
Any advice on this from someone who had experience with installers is
greatly appreciated.
>> and I don't want to clutter Debian Developers with spurious bug
>> reports.
gw> if debian multimedia is an official subproject of debian, then
gw> i dont think that bug reports that deal with it specifically
gw> would be cluttering other developers.
From what I gathered, the time between debian-multimedia becoming an
official subproject of Debian and us going out with a new release -
because of, amongst other things, project schedules which we must
comply to - will produce a delta in which there could be spurious bug
reports. And I wish to make sure that Debian is not "disturbed" by
DeMuDi as much as possible.
bye,
andrea
--
Andrea Glorioso andrea.glorioso@centrotemporeale.it
Centro Tempo Reale http://www.centrotemporeale.it/
AGNULA/DeMuDi Technical Manager http://www.[demudi|agnula].org/
"There's no free expression without control on the tools you use"
Reply to: