Re: Proposal for fixing automake (was Re: State of automake packages)
On Sun, 9 Jun 2002 14:15:59 -0400
Eric Dorland <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > Hmm.. it's not an alternative if it is not compatible.
> > It's like bison and yacc, gpc and gcc.
> Well to some degree they are compatible. I think a better analogy
> would be the various vi clones. They all sort of do the same things,
> but they are not necessarily compatible.
I had an impression that newer version of automake required
newer version of autoconf, which was nowhere near compatible.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org