On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 01:54:11PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > > Hmm.. it's not an alternative if it is not compatible. > > > It's like bison and yacc, gpc and gcc. > > > > Well to some degree they are compatible. I think a better analogy > > would be the various vi clones. They all sort of do the same things, > > but they are not necessarily compatible. > > I had an impression that newer version of automake required > newer version of autoconf, which was nowhere near compatible. It's compatibile for most things. There are a few thou-shalt-nots which cause the new version to be broken, but they're easily fixed in almost all cases. They just require someone to actually do the fixing. -- Joseph Carter <email@example.com> I swallowed your goldfish * bma_home gropes you <bma_home> "oups, wrong channel" <bma_home> </acf> <cerb> quit groping me <doogie> you know you like it. <bma_home> actually, it was "grope me baby" <gecko-> touch my son and you die, bma ;) <doogie> gecko-: but your wife is ok?
Description: PGP signature