On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 04:00:58PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 03:03:36PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Sun, May 19, 2002 at 03:56:57AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > In order to support security updates, we need this new build system up
> > > on all architectures, and we have 11/11 to go.
> > Sounds great!
> Er, to go. Not done. When I see ratios I think of completion.
"Architectures done" isn't a very accurate measure of how much is done.
If you're really desperate for an estimate, then 50-75% done might be
accurate. Or it might not. Not having redone
> > > "When it's ready". When there's more precise information it'll be made
> > > available. The fact that no information has been made announced should
> > > be taken as an indication that there's none to give.
> Well, that's depressing. Who are the people nominally in charge of
> getting this work done?
I would've thought team@security.debian.org, but apparently it's me. James
Troup is handling the security archive software, Ryan Murray is handling
the buildd stuff.
(This isn't an invitation for random people to start pestering either of
them)
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``BAM! Science triumphs again!''
-- http://www.angryflower.com/vegeta.gif
Attachment:
pgplDux1FYEBh.pgp
Description: PGP signature