Re: kernel-linux-*, generic build process
>>"Erich" == Erich Schubert <email@example.com> writes:
Erich> No, it isn't. It is NOT the upstream tarball. It's a
Erich> usually-repacked version of the tarball, often reproducing a
Erich> different directory structure than the upstream tarball does.
Erich> See, not all upstream authors follow the package-version
Erich> directory naming.
You are definitely behind the times. You do not have to repack
the upstream in order to fix the dir name. Havfen't had to do that
Erich> This will lead to a different MD5 checksum -> evil as this is not
I notice you maintain a number of packages; perhaps you had
better check and undo any repacking you may be doing. I am surprised
you missed out on the pristine source recommendation.
HOW TO PROVE IT, PART 4 proof by personal communication:
'Eight-dimensional colored cycle stripping is NP-complete [Karp,
personal communication].' proof by reduction to the wrong problem:
'To see that infinite-dimensional colored cycle stripping is
decidable, we reduce it to the halting problem.' proof by reference
to inaccessible literature: The author cites a simple corollary of a
theorem to be found in a privately circulated memoir of the Slovenian
Philological Society, 1883. proof by importance: A large body of
useful consequences all follow from the proposition in question.
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C