Re: bind9-chroot (was: questions on ITP)
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 07:34:29PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> It's still possible, but tell me a good reason why I should keep debian
> on my server, when it offers my to chroot bind, but only if I use the
> latest kernel? I see no need to keep debian in that case as os for the
> server and so I can switch it.
Well, if Debian means so little to you, go ahead. See if I care.
> No, because we already have now for quite some time a bind package in
> debian without an automatic chroot. So we should either offer a chroot
> for both kernel versions 2.4.x and 2.2.x or still stay with the old
> packages offering no automatic chroot.
Why?
Perhaps you could backport mount --bind to 2.2. That would solve
the problem. Or you could emulate it with NFS or something.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>
Reply to: