[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: wterm in potato

On Sat, Feb 19, 2000 at 10:59:03PM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
> I'd bet a significant sum that the RM didn't actually look very close at
> the bug or the fix, but only the priority, assuming that the bug reporter
> and/or package maintainer had ensured that it was set correctly.

Unless he says otherwise, that's not what happened. :)

> I'd be more concerned if we didn't have 19 other term programs that *do*
> work.

OTOH, if there are another 19 working X terminal emulators, why should
anyone complain if one buggy one is removed? ;>

Remember that you not having a package available doesn't mean it gets
removed from users' machines... also, the package stayed in unstable.

Anyway, this discussion isn't getting us anywhere, what's important[1] is
that the package is (to be) fixed. EOT.

enJoy -*/\*- don't even try to pronounce my first name

[1] let's not argue about this, please? ;)

Reply to: