Re: wterm in potato
On 19-Feb-00, 03:09 (CST), Alexey Vyskubov <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2000 at 05:07:30AM -0200, Lalo Martins wrote:
> > Is the bug ``wterm is not 8-bit clean'' really
> > release-critical? I'd say, stamp a warning in the description
> > and bring it back in.
> For me (I posted the bug) it is.
At the risk of sounding snippy, the fact that a package doesn't suit
your needs is not "release critical", nor does the fact that wterm is
not 8-bit clean qualify as an "important" bug: presumably many others do
find it usable. Lalo's proposed solution is perfectly acceptable.
> Please note that my bugreport gives detail description of the problem
> and *bugfix*, so the real critical bug is "wterm is not maintained".
A valid complaint, but still not release-critical, IMO (although
Richard's is the one that really matters).
Steve Greenland <firstname.lastname@example.org>
(Please do not CC me on mail sent to this list; I subscribe to and read
every list I post to.)