[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Possible ITP: Rescue Package



On Sun, Aug 08, 1999 at 05:57:15PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> > You may not need that for just getting libc fixed sure, but it could sure
> > help if libc isn't the problem (at least you may not think so) and you
> > need to fix something else in a clean environment...
> 
> If libc (and slang) isn't the problem, what do you need a static editor for?
> Once those two libs are ok, you have ae. Or once libc and ncurses are ok,
> you have vi.

You're right, you could GET an editor quickly, but completeness seems IMO
to want one provided static anyway, just in case.  There's probably no
reason for the boot zip either but I plan to do it (given time to really
think about it---LWE, starting classes, and a handful of other projects
are needing to be done first)

-- 
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>             Debian GNU/Linux developer
GnuPG: 2048g/3F9C2A43 - 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC  44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3
PGP 2.6: 2048R/50BDA0ED - E8 D6 84 81 E3 A8 BB 77  8E E2 29 96 C9 44 5F BE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
<LauraDax> !seen god
<Tabi-> LauraDax, I don't remember seeing "god"

Attachment: pgpjqICwywgPU.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: