[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: software licensing



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com> writes:
> Why are our hands any more tied here than in other circumstances where
> the authors won't provide us with an acceptable license?

What I mean is that we can't do anything to eliminate the problem in
the larger sense.  We can refuse to participate, and we can bring
social pressure to bear on the violators, but that's all... if they
don't listen to us, nothing really changes outside of Debian.

I don't know about you, but I think a situation like this deserves to
be fixed for everyone, not just us -- my own personal sense of ethics
(not to mention the copyright law) will be satisfied by simply not
distributing questionable software, but I still find myself
disappointed that there is not more that can be done to actually fix
the underlying problem.

- --Rob

- -- 
Rob Tillotson  N9MTB  <robt@debian.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQCVAwUBNe7CDnR+ngWruQ4VAQHingP/ZhnQK4yFU82aaaKVsJArGtilR3Qhnyr9
i8frvFea75T3a3uXkvPpPt2i2nnRVXvO2cunQ6NYIH6Lz6Sb+amv61KAPgef1iN2
RJx0vMTw3ekJ7puVMS8wOvwWux4X4xYgy2+9g7nNFVwzfdiMubM5U3NoP3gxEa7g
6U3S9WGY19w=
=StIt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: