[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RH and GNOME



Enrique Zanardi <ezanardi@ull.es> wrote:
> > The GPL means that it can be the same kernel, that's what.
> 
> But why would we want to use all that stupid extensions (perhaps not only
> stupid, but unstable, degrading performance, causing random data
> corruption, blue screens of death or whoknowswhat)?

I think you're confusing Linux with Windows.  Windows is the one
that's not GPLed.

> Why would we want to install enlighment in /opt?

What does that have to do with anything?

[1] Enlightenment isn't part of any OS,
[2] Enlightenment is PRE-ALPHA software.

For all I care, enlightenment could be installed in /var/tmp/ -- it
doesn't matter because anything compatible with these development
versions of enlightenment are GUARANTEED to break by the time
the final release comes around.


> Just because it is the "industry standard", a la Microsoft Word?

Why am I even bothering to respond to this?

Microsoft Word is not GPLed.  Microsoft Word is not a part of Linux,
and Microsoft Word does not get installed in /opt/.  Probably the
most significant of those points is that Microsoft Word is not GPLed.

> GPLed code doesn't guarantee good code.

True.

Yet GPLed apps tend to be significantly higher quality than comparable
commercial apps.

This is one of the big value-added features of the free software
community.

> If somehow one of the players becomes the dominant player we may be
> forced to adopt their "industry standards" even if they are inferior
> products.

True, but not particularly relevant for the case of GPLed code (unless,
like KDE, it's GPLed but not really GPLed code).

> We must work as hard as we can to offer an interesting option, to give
> things that the other distros don't give, to keep being an important
> player in this game, just to avoid Linux becoming a de-facto monopoly.

Er... right.

And there's better reasons that that.  [Better goals, too.]

-- 
Raul


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


Reply to: