On Tue, Jul 21, 1998 at 08:46:01AM -0400, Tim Sailer wrote: > > I also still object for your above reason calling the file format ".rpm". I > > would object as strongly if we were going with the .deb format. Proposed > > standards should not include proprietary names. > > Why not just call it .lsb so we know what the format is.. Because if we don't raise the issue, it'll just be .rpm as it has been before.
Attachment:
pgp9D0BietfF2.pgp
Description: PGP signature