Re: Draft GR for permitting private discussion
> So, really every other aspect of that process is malleable. In this
> case, I it would be incredibly humble and poignant to initiate a
> -project discussion prior to the official process since that sets the
> clock in motion (i.e. someone could get antsy and call for seconds
> before there's really been appropriate time for, yes, pre-discussion
> to figure out if this is something the project actually wants).
Quick correction: just read tech committee proposals don't need
actually need seconds.
Anyway, same conclusion. It sets the clock in motion for the two-week
till vote calling.