On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 05:42:27PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote: > >Maybe it is time to attempt "step 2 of jigdo world domination"?? ;) > >jigdo could be made more robust by NOT deleting outdated packages from the >main FTP archive immediately. Instead, they should be left there for >(ideally) another 10 days or so. If this turns out to need too much space, >it could be restricted to packages from testing/stable only. > >Does anyone have statistics about how much data has changed in the >testing/unstable archives over the last months? (E.g. bandwidth >requirements of their testing/unstable mirror?) I've been working with manty on a better long-term solution for the snapshots so that we can keep them around much longer on the fallback mirror. Of course, gluck eating its disks has rather curtailed progress on this... :-( -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com "I can't ever sleep on planes ... call it irrational if you like, but I'm afraid I'll miss my stop" -- Vivek Dasmohapatra
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature