Re: Proposal: move win32-loader in SVN repository
Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:19:35AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> >> few alternatives for directory names but noone commented on them; the
>> >> move has been done without a widely agreement from the team and people
>> >> that were involved discussing on the thread didn't agree too (me
>> >> included).
>> >
>> > Well, that doesn't really makes a problem for me. Action was needed,
>> > Frans did the action...and even enforced the discussion by doing
>> > so..:-)...What would have happened if he hadn't? Very probably a dying
>> > discussion, all of us going back to our various tasks and nothing
>> > made.
>>
>> Sorry I disagree. We always preferred to hold changes until we get
>> agreement. Many times it has been complained here by mistakes made by
>> me, or others, [...]
>
> Since it sounds like I'm being implicitly referenced here, let me add to it
> that I don't feel the act of judging harshly someone's mistakes deserves a
> reciprocal response. So why not just ignore this and start afresh on what
> location is most suitable? FWIW, my only concern with regard to location is
> that it isn't changed every day, which I hope is not too demanding ;-)
I wasn't implicitly referencing you but past decisions that are always
discussed here in list. I used this to justify that we always try to
get agreement before doing something even more when it's not urgent.
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: otavio@debian.org UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
Reply to: