Re: Proposal: move win32-loader in SVN repository
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:19:35AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> few alternatives for directory names but noone commented on them; the
> >> move has been done without a widely agreement from the team and people
> >> that were involved discussing on the thread didn't agree too (me
> >> included).
> >
> > Well, that doesn't really makes a problem for me. Action was needed,
> > Frans did the action...and even enforced the discussion by doing
> > so..:-)...What would have happened if he hadn't? Very probably a dying
> > discussion, all of us going back to our various tasks and nothing
> > made.
>
> Sorry I disagree. We always preferred to hold changes until we get
> agreement. Many times it has been complained here by mistakes made by
> me, or others, [...]
Since it sounds like I'm being implicitly referenced here, let me add to it
that I don't feel the act of judging harshly someone's mistakes deserves a
reciprocal response. So why not just ignore this and start afresh on what
location is most suitable? FWIW, my only concern with regard to location is
that it isn't changed every day, which I hope is not too demanding ;-)
--
Robert Millan
<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What use is a phone call… if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)
Reply to: