Christian Perrier wrote: > Well, I volunterily launched this, about tasksel because I feel like > the package is, in reality, maintained by the D-I team since about > 2004. > > Joey is definitely the one who bringed the most to it (working on it > with big "hops") so I think he should have the last work on this. > > Pros: l10n, definitely. Translators are the same ones and the only > ones who aren't allowed to tasksel but are for d-i are those I > forgot to add > > Cons: Frans argument is valid, certainly. We don't want to give this > feeling and if someone wants to step deeper into tasksel, we don't > want to prevent him|her to do so. I would much rather not merge independent repositories into the d-i svn repository, since they will have to be split out again if/when we move to git or other distributed revision control systems. Independent of repository, I have no problems with tasksel being moved from the tasksel alioth package to the d-i one, if managing its committers is an issue. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature