On Monday 24 March 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote: > If we're going to move tasksel (maybe others) there, maybe would be > better to decide where to put them all together. I'm personally not in favor of moving tasksel to D-I. D-I SVN is not "all your source are belong to us"... We already have a significant maintenance burden as a team, I don't see why we should add to it by moving anything that's remotely related to the repository. If we do, we might as well also include apt and aptitude. I'm also concerned about the size of the checkout, which is huge already.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.