Quoting Frans Pop (elendil@planet.nl):
> I'm personally not in favor of moving tasksel to D-I.
> D-I SVN is not "all your source are belong to us"...
Well, I volunterily launched this, about tasksel because I feel like
the package is, in reality, maintained by the D-I team since about
2004.
Joey is definitely the one who bringed the most to it (working on it
with big "hops") so I think he should have the last work on this.
Pros: l10n, definitely. Translators are the same ones and the only
ones who aren't allowed to tasksel but are for d-i are those I
forgot to add
Cons: Frans argument is valid, certainly. We don't want to give this
feeling and if someone wants to step deeper into tasksel, we don't
want to prevent him|her to do so.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature