[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: etch-backports strangeness

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 09:21:35AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@connexer.com> writes:
> > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 09:57:39PM +0000, Nick Leverton wrote:
> >> This sounds like an apt-key issue.  I don't recall exact details but I
> >> think I have experienced in the past that apt ignores pinning when the
> >> key is not correct.
> > Oddly, the problem appears to have resolved itself overnight.  The only
> > strange thing remaining is that lintian wants to 2.2.something, which I
> > don't recall being released with Lenny.
> It wasn't, so that's odd.
Somehow, it ended up in etch-backports:

  Installed: 1.24.0~bpo40+1
  Candidate: 2.2.0~bpo40+1
  Version table:
     2.2.0~bpo40+1 0
        200 http://apt-proxy.connexer.com etch-backports/main Packages
 *** 1.24.0~bpo40+1 0
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     1.23.28 0
        500 http://apt-proxy.connexer.com etch/main Packages

Does it need to be removed by the bpo archive maintainers?



Roberto C. Sánchez

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: