Re: etch-backports strangeness
Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@connexer.com> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 09:57:39PM +0000, Nick Leverton wrote:
>> This sounds like an apt-key issue. I don't recall exact details but I
>> think I have experienced in the past that apt ignores pinning when the
>> key is not correct.
> Oddly, the problem appears to have resolved itself overnight. The only
> strange thing remaining is that lintian wants to 2.2.something, which I
> don't recall being released with Lenny.
It wasn't, so that's odd.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: