Re: etch-backports strangeness
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 09:05:08AM (GMT-0500), Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> What I do not understand is why hundreds of packages would be scheduled
> to upgrade, even when many of them are installed from the etch version,
> and not from the etch-backports version.
> Could someone hazard a guess as to what is going on?
It's seems likely that there is a line with "stable" instead of "etch"
in your /etc/apt/sources.list, automatically trigerring the upgrade when
Lenny was released this week end.