[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: sudo security Was: Reporting missing package during install



On Di, 2013-12-10 at 23:54 +0100, Gian Uberto Lauri wrote:
> Clever attacks manifest themselves a long time after the "infection" in order
> to poison backups. And backup media may fail when they are most needed.
> That's an effect of Murphy's law :).

Read about my backup strategy below. Only one time in my life I lost a
little bit, because I made a mistake, not because there was an attack. I
mounted a partition read/write instead of read only.

> 
> > On 10/dic/2013, at 21:54, Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@alice-dsl.net> wrote:
> > 
> >> On Di, 2013-12-10 at 17:56 +0100, Gian Uberto Lauri wrote:
> >> I would not trust backups as an absolute safety
> > 
> > You don't trust backups? Why?
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Ralf
> > 
> > PS: I make complete backups, IOW I backup everything, don't sync, but
> > make complete new backups nearly daily. At the end of a month I delete
> > some of the backups done in that month, but at least keep one for that
> > month for around the next 365 days. The backups are not done to a drive
> > that is fix connected to the computer, but to a special external backup
> > drive. From time to time I copy a backup to two internal drives and data
> > to other media such as DVDs.
> > 
> > Nothing is 100% safe, but nothing is more safe than with regularity
> > backup the install and data.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> > Archive: [🔎] 1386708892.2211.29.camel@saucy">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 1386708892.2211.29.camel@saucy
> > 
> > 
> 
> 




Reply to: