On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 01:23:16AM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon scrawled: > On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 11:16:40AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > > Why the Mesa packages carry a 3 is also historical baggage and most > > > people seem to be unaware why that 3 is there in the first place. > > > > Yes, and it's been carried through. > > Like I said... most people are unaware of why that 3 is there... you in > particular seem to give it a meanting it doesn't have. > > > > Hint, James *did* follow the policy when he first created the Mesa > > > packages. > > > > And Policy has changed, and we should probably reflect that, sure. > > No, it hasn't. OK, so why don't you give me a hand instead of being obtuse for the hell of it. Why was the 3 there, originally? -- Daniel Stone <dstone@trinity.unimelb.edu.au> Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
Attachment:
pgpnMsTVowq_c.pgp
Description: PGP signature