Re: xlibmesa naming and relationships
On Fre, 2003-01-31 at 18:11, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> I still don't get it. There's no incompatibility between xlibmesa3-gl,
> xlibmesa4-gl and xlibmesa5-gl to come, so what's the point of the
> different names? The worst thing IMHO is x-window-system-core depending
> on one particular of these, but I think it would be much easier for
> everyone if we had a common name which reflects the libGL API used.
Also, what's with changing the semantics of the libgl1 virtual package?
Shouldn't a new one like libgl1-noglu be introduced?
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast
Reply to: