Re: state of the cdrom mirrors report
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 01:47:47PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Correction... if we're going to bother with a solution, then it should be
> > complete. Your program certainly can be considered an improved output, but
> > given the amount of false positives already noticed, it seems as if we're
> > switching from one half-solution to another.
>
> My program has no false positives. If it detects the mirror as up with
> an image, it's up with an image. It has false negatives -- mirrors that
> use nonstandard naming, firewalling, or are down right when it checks.
Right, sorry.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Reply to: