Josip Rodin wrote: > Correction... if we're going to bother with a solution, then it should be > complete. Your program certainly can be considered an improved output, but > given the amount of false positives already noticed, it seems as if we're > switching from one half-solution to another. My program has no false positives. If it detects the mirror as up with an image, it's up with an image. It has false negatives -- mirrors that use nonstandard naming, firewalling, or are down right when it checks. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
pgpcyj381n9JJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature