Re: [proposal] IRC Meeting
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 01:24:45PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Lesley Binks
> <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?day=3&month=9&year=2010&p1=0&p2=196&p3=176&p4=770
> > shows the time differences between UTC and Perth (Australia), San
> > Diego (West Coast, USA) and New Delhi (india)
> > So 2200 UTC is 6 am the next day in Perth, 3am the next day in New
> > Delhi and 3pm the same day in San Diego.
> > I would suggest that 1300 or 1400 UTC actually look like reasonable
> > times over that spread of cities but I would think that time implies a
> > Saturday slot all round?
> Unfortunately, since there's people here from all over the world,
> there's no time that will fit everybody.
> Let me suggest that for the next meeting more time slots are
> available, so that people from different timezones can express their
> real preference. For the meeting tomorrow, the poll has already been
> published and answered, changing the time now will probably only
> create confusion.
> For the next one, just show the whole Saturday slots, and allow people
> to select the available times. I fear that it still won't be possible
> to meet everybody's needs, but we could find a better compromise.
It seems the best way!