Re: [proposal] IRC Meeting
On 3 September 2010 17:24, Margarita Manterola <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Lesley Binks
> <email@example.com> wrote:
>> shows the time differences between UTC and Perth (Australia), San
>> Diego (West Coast, USA) and New Delhi (india)
>> So 2200 UTC is 6 am the next day in Perth, 3am the next day in New
>> Delhi and 3pm the same day in San Diego.
>> I would suggest that 1300 or 1400 UTC actually look like reasonable
>> times over that spread of cities but I would think that time implies a
>> Saturday slot all round?
> Unfortunately, since there's people here from all over the world,
> there's no time that will fit everybody.
> Let me suggest that for the next meeting more time slots are
> available, so that people from different timezones can express their
> real preference. For the meeting tomorrow, the poll has already been
> published and answered, changing the time now will probably only
> create confusion.
> For the next one, just show the whole Saturday slots, and allow people
> to select the available times. I fear that it still won't be possible
> to meet everybody's needs, but we could find a better compromise.
This sounds good to me Marga :)