Re: Localizing main site?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am 18.06.2005 um 16:09 schrieb Thierry Reding:
What would be the simplest tool in this case?
SVN, I think, as it has the advantage over CVS not needing a special
port and working over http.
If every women/member wanted to put an own version on different
servers, bazaar might be the right tool.
Again, I don't really see how using Arch would differ from using
CVS or SVN
if this were the goal.
I do not know, if here is the right place to discuss the differences
between distributed and centralized archives (last ones are used for
nearly all the large centralized projects, where many people are
working on).
- - DW needs one version of the website only and a consistent one.
- - the first makes it necessary to build the pages from one
centralized repository instead of decentralized repositories that may
differ from each other.
- - It is possible to make local builds and see the results, if one
wants, but it is also possible to commit a single path without having
a whole repository
Please have a look on the page telling how to work with www.d.o cvs,
and see how much simplier it si to get a working copy: The very first
steps on http://www.nl.debian.org/devel/website/using_cvs are to be
done only once.
From what I have read about baz which was not available for debian
woody, things are much more complicated. When using CVS first time
years ago I just followed about 10 lines of instructions and have had
a work version on my machine to build wine myself and trying patches.
Distributed and centralized repositories work different from each
other and have a different purposes.
If I am wrong, maybe, all those people using CVS and SVN for good
reasons are wrong, too?
greetings
Jutta
- --
http://www.witch.westfalen.de
http://witch.muensterland.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAkK0N2IACgkQOgZ5N97kHkf7rwCglOeqwJ2tJYVNdxfoG649YxGK
IG0An26k2wMamlBS2IVWym9oN15XOIuh
=Z6vK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: