Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms
On 3/27/21 9:01 AM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 01:56:08PM +0100, Timo Weingärtner wrote:
>> Hallo Kurt Roeckx,
>> 27.03.21 13:03 Kurt Roeckx:
>>> I've added this option on the website. I'm still processing emails.
>>> Note that it's my interpretation that if changes are accepts that
>>> there is no need to second it again. If you don't agree with the
>>> changes need to say so, and which point and become the proposer of
>>> a new option and need to look for seconds again.
>>> Please let me know if there is something that's currently on the
>>> website that you don't agree with.
>> The content is fine, maybe the headings could be improved to look like (as a
>> recent example) in the systemd GR.
> I'm not sure what you mean, but I'm not really happy with the
> current wording of the option names. It's up to the one calling
> for vote to suggest the names. But I'm sure that any suggestions
> are welcome.
Instead of "No statement, sign individual" this option could be titled
"No official statement on this subject"