Hi, On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 06:52:02PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > In case these changes are regarded as more than editorial (which is your > > call, but I feel they are), the new proposal requires new seconds > I'm not sure why you think the proposal requires seconds if it > replaces an older proposal. As long as nobody objects it doesn't > need seconds. Atleast that's my current interpretation, feel free > to try and convince me otherwise. The existing seconds refer to the old text, and I believe that the changes do alter the meaning of the text. Simon
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature