[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Naming of non-uploading DDs (Was: GR: welcome non-packaging contributors as Debian project members)

On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:45:52AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:48:02PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > I like that a lot more than the other wording, thus seconded.
> > Please don't go and make this more confusing for me.  As far as I
> > can tell this wasn't meant to be amendment yet.  He will probably
> > accept this or something simular as amendment replacing the
> > orignal text.  So at that time I could put you down as someone
> > that seconds that proposal.  You now basicly seem to have created
> > a second proposal.
> I'm not sure I can create a proposal without actually saying so. So no,
> not yet. :)
> Basically, there are now two versions of the text floating around, where
> only one has been proposed as a GR, and where the original proposer
> (Stefano) has the option to adopt the changes, and thus turn the second
> version into his proposal, dropping the first.
> In case these changes are regarded as more than editorial (which is your
> call, but I feel they are), the new proposal requires new seconds

I'm not sure why you think the proposal requires seconds if it
replaces an older proposal.  As long as nobody objects it doesn't
need seconds.  Atleast that's my current interpretation, feel free
to try and convince me otherwise.


Reply to: