Re: Naming of non-uploading DDs (Was: GR: welcome non-packaging contributors as Debian project members)
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:48:02PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > I like that a lot more than the other wording, thus seconded.
> Please don't go and make this more confusing for me. As far as I
> can tell this wasn't meant to be amendment yet. He will probably
> accept this or something simular as amendment replacing the
> orignal text. So at that time I could put you down as someone
> that seconds that proposal. You now basicly seem to have created
> a second proposal.
I'm not sure I can create a proposal without actually saying so. So no,
not yet. :)
Basically, there are now two versions of the text floating around, where
only one has been proposed as a GR, and where the original proposer
(Stefano) has the option to adopt the changes, and thus turn the second
version into his proposal, dropping the first.
In case these changes are regarded as more than editorial (which is your
call, but I feel they are), the new proposal requires new seconds (well,
technically, it doesn't if the DPL proposes the GR), so I'm adding mine,
assuming that the changes are adopted. If they aren't, I'm inclined to
formally proposing this as an alternate text, but I believe others will
beat me to it anyway.
This feels like an excellent round of [Name of our Leader].