[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Discussion period: Suspension of the changes of the Project's membership procedures.



Hi,

The message in 20081025011055.GA10094@kunpuu.plessy.org has received
enough seconds to start the discussion period. The text of the
resolution is:
------------------------------------------------------------------
 - Following the announcement of the 22nd of October on the debian-devel-announce
   mailing list (Message-id: <878wsgmi1j.fsf@vorlon.ganneff.de>) about "Developer
   Status";

 - Given the importance of defining how the Project accepts new members;

 - Because of the strong opposition to the method used to prepare, discuss and
   decide the announced changes, and without judging their validity;

 - In accordance with the paragraphs 4.1(3) and 4.2(2.2) of the Constitution;

The Debian Project, by way of a general resolution of its developers, decides:

  The changes announced the 22nd of October on the debian-devel-announce
  mailing list (Message-id: <878wsgmi1j.fsf@vorlon.ganneff.de>) are
  suspended [§4.1(3)].  This suspension is effective immediately [§4.2(2.2)].

In addition, the developers make the following statement:

  The delegates of the Project leader are asked to not take decisions that are
  not consensual about the membership procedures of the Project, and to let
  these procedures change by way of a general resolution if no consensus
  can be reached.
------------------------------------------------------------------

It has been proposed by Charles Plessy, and seconds have been received
for this version by MJ Ray, Robert Millan, Baz Zoetekouw, Frans Pop and
Amaya Rodrigo Sastre.

Further details will appear at http://www.debian.org/vote/2008/vote_002
shortly.

Thanks,
Neil
-- 
* stockholm bangs head against budget
<h01ger> outsch
<stockholm> h01ger: it is still very soft, i did not hurt myself
<gwolf> stockholm: But you bled on the budget, and now it's red again!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: