Call for seconds: Suspension of the changes of the Project's membership procedures.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dear all,
Joerg Jaspert answered to my questions and some others on his blog, but the
informations that I think we need are still not provided.
- It is not known whether the Secretary, the Project leader and his delegates
for the system administration, the FTP archive, the maintainance of the
keyring and the front desk endorse his proposal or not.
- He wrote that things are not implemented and wont'be for "a bit more", but
we still do not know if they are decided or not (this is not the same as
implemented or not), nor how long is "a bit more".
I regret this precipitation and confusion, and therefore propose the following
general resolution and call for seconders.
- ---------------------------------------------------
- Following the announcement of the 22nd of October on the debian-devel-announce
mailing list (Message-id: <878wsgmi1j.fsf@vorlon.ganneff.de>) about "Developer
Status";
- Given the importance of defining how the Project accepts new members;
- Because of the strong opposition to the method used to prepare, discuss and
decide the announced changes, and without judging on their validity;
The Debian Project, by the way of a general resolution of its developpers, decides:
- The changes announced the 22nd of October on the debian-devel-announce
mailing list (Message-id: <878wsgmi1j.fsf@vorlon.ganneff.de>) are suspended.
- Evolution of the membership procedures of the Project will be prepared in a
discussion that will be finished by consensus or a general resolution.
- ---------------------------------------------------
Actually, if the GR road is eventually taken, it can be done through amending
this proposal. This will save time and energy.
Have a nice day,
- --
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkkBu2MACgkQdYl1krr+x/LMFwCfUdcNFFXXGeC8RpJGwCW4HC84
lRAAnjmxE0x5wOXqRHDIZSx6+HM+GkVF
=V5Az
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: